IN Brief:
- Fancourt Property Group has been appointed by Sunley Project Solutions to deliver 17 Esca House residences.
- Work involves demolition, retaining façade elements and rebuilding over Circle and District line infrastructure.
- Seven named Statom businesses will contribute, but the programme and specific ground engineering method are not disclosed.
Fancourt Property Group, Statom Group’s turnkey delivery business, has been appointed by Sunley Project Solutions to redevelop Esca House in Bayswater, Westminster, into 17 residences. The works are described as involving demolition, retention of façade elements over the first two floors and construction of a new four-storey building. The existing property stands over London Underground’s Circle and District lines, creating an important interface between the proposed structural works and operational railway infrastructure.
The appointment was reported on 26 October, with Statom identifying seven specialist businesses for the main construction disciplines. An earlier property transaction provides a separate point in the project’s history: Knight Frank reported the sale of the already consented Esca House residential redevelopment in December 2025. Fancourt’s appointment is therefore a new delivery development, rather than a new planning approval. No current contract sum, start date, completion date or construction method statement has been made public.
Retaining parts of a façade while removing the structure behind it requires temporary support that can resist wind loads and maintain stability as original floors and internal walls are taken away. The temporary works and new permanent frame need compatible connection details, while demolition sequencing must take account of the remaining fabric. Neither the proposed retention system nor the amount of existing structure to remain has been specified beyond the two-floor façade reference. The appointment confirms the nature of the work, but not the detailed structural design.
Ground engineering is particularly sensitive where existing railway tunnels lie beneath a site. Excavation, foundation loading and piling can produce ground movements that require assessment against the geometry and condition of neighbouring infrastructure. The foundation choice depends on geotechnical investigation and railway-interface requirements, including any movement limits that apply to the tunnels. The available project account identifies Franki Foundations for piling expertise, but gives no pile type, tunnel depth, permitted settlement figure or details of agreements with London Underground. An assessment would also distinguish temporary vibration during construction from longer-term ground movement as the replacement frame is loaded. Where asset protection monitoring is required, baseline measurements and agreed trigger thresholds help engineers compare measured movement with the predictions used in design. These controls cannot be assumed to have been installed at Esca House; the published appointment provides no monitoring plan or agreed thresholds.
Temporary restraint above ground and protection of the railway below have to be reconciled within the construction sequence. The working area must accommodate demolition plant, lifting operations, material deliveries and removal of waste while maintaining stability of retained elements. New loads need a defined path through the replacement frame and foundations. Specific crane locations, haulage routes and temporary foundation arrangements have not been released, so their feasibility cannot be judged from the appointment alone.
Statom Demolition is assigned the demolition discipline, Franki Foundations piling and Apex Engineering design. Statom Group is identified for foundations and frame delivery. These allocations make the planned division of work visible, although they do not establish whether the team will use bored or driven piles, or whether restricted-access machinery will be necessary. The selection of methods will need to reflect the underlying ground conditions, the existing structure and any requirements of the railway asset owner.
Trident Lifting Solutions is named for tower crane services, Harvill Brickwork for brickwork and Spark Tech MEP for mechanical and electrical systems. Their interfaces run through the structural programme: cranes must be coordinated with temporary works and load paths, brickwork with retained and newly built elements, and services with floors, risers and the final envelope. A coordinated contractor structure can bring those design decisions together, but it does not replace engineering checks or the assignment of statutory project duties.
Railway protection is also a matter of construction timing. Certain activities may require additional review, protective measures, monitoring or agreed access arrangements, depending on the chosen methods and risks to the assets beneath. The team has not disclosed any possession plan, engineering-hours restrictions, monitoring specification or expected change to passenger services. The continuing operation of the lines should therefore be treated as an important site condition, rather than as evidence that work can proceed without railway-related restrictions.
The new appointment advances delivery of a previously consented 17-home redevelopment on a constrained central London site. Its housing output is modest relative to the engineering interfaces around façade retention, demolition and sub-surface infrastructure. Confirmation of the demolition and support methodology, the foundation design, railway consents where required and a dated construction programme will establish how Fancourt intends to sequence the project. No specific solution or start on site has yet been announced.

